When Providers Face Conflicting Information
Briefly

Healthcare providers experience cognitive dissonance when faced with contradictory beliefs or when their decisions conflict with evidence-based medicine. They may resort to defense mechanisms like rationalization and denial to alleviate psychological discomfort, which can hinder their ability to adopt better treatments. Resistance to new evidence creates challenges, particularly in high-pressure environments where rapid decisions may not reflect best practices. Intellectual humility can help providers navigate these tensions and remain open to new information, ultimately benefiting patient care by allowing for improved treatment approaches.
Healthcare providers use defense mechanisms like rationalization and denial to lessen psychological discomfort, which can hinder the adoption of improved treatment methods.
Resistance to new evidence can obstruct the implementation of better treatments, demonstrating the complexity of changing established practices in healthcare.
Intellectual humility is essential for healthcare providers as it encourages constructive management of cognitive dissonance, promoting openness to new information.
Cognitive dissonance occurs for healthcare providers when new research conflicts with established practices, impacting patient care and decision-making processes.
Read at Psychology Today
[
|
]