The article discusses concerns regarding county grants in Santa Clara, suggesting they may serve as tools for political favoritism due to lack of accountability and operational rules. It references a grand jury report advocating for essential reforms in how grants are managed. Additionally, modifications to the Residential Parking Permit program in East Palo Alto are criticized for removing safeguards such as free permits and community approval requirements, indicating a trend towards top-down decision-making that may disadvantage residents. Calls for equitable and transparent policies are emphasized.
After reading this article, county residents should review the June 2024 Civil Grand Jury report "No Strings Attached: County of Santa Clara Board Inventory Items," which deals with this very subject.
However, without a fundamental change in how the program is managed, it continues to have the appearance of being a tool for political favoritism.
The revised version removes both protections, introducing new fees and eliminating the need for community approval.
We need a parking program that reflects our city's values: equity, transparency and local input. The City Council must do better.
Collection
[
|
...
]