"Skillz accused Papaya of deceiving players by failing to disclose it sometimes used bots in lieu of fellow human competitors in certain games and tournaments."
"The jury awarded $420 million in damages and $652 million in disgorgement, totaling $1.072 billion against Papaya Gaming Ltd."
"Skillz claimed Papaya advertised that it had paid users $6.7 billion in winnings for playing online games like solitaire, but that $4.7 billion of that went to games where bots won."
Papaya Gaming Ltd. was found liable for false advertising and ordered to pay $420 million in damages and $652 million in disgorgement to Skillz Platform Inc. Skillz accused Papaya of misleading players by not disclosing the use of bots instead of human competitors in games. Additionally, Skillz claimed that Papaya falsely advertised $6.7 billion in winnings, with $4.7 billion attributed to games won by bots, misleading players about the nature of competition.
Read at Bloomberglaw
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]