"The selection we have here - the Honor Magic8 Pro, Oppo Find X9 Pro, and vivo X300 Pro - is closer to being truly international and as such this comparison has potential for being of more practical use than our earlier article, which was more of an academic pursuit, given the selection of the phones - two China-only releases from Oppo and vivo, plus a Google-less Huawei joining the global Samsung and Xiaomi."
"All three of the phones here adopt a relatively similar camera configuration with three rear modules (so no double telephotos). One of them, the 'main' camera, has a sensor with an optical format around 1/1.3", a 23-24mm focal length, and an f/1.5-f/1.6 aperture - no more changeable apertures on the Honor, and no 1.0"-type sensors either."
"The telephotos are also similar, but still not without nuances. All three use 200MP sensors, yes, but the Honor and the vivo have larger 1/1.4" imagers while the Oppo opts for a 1/1.56" unit. The Oppo differs in its lens too - its periscope has a 70mm focal length and an f/2.1 aperture in contrast to the 85mm f/2.6-f/2.7 lens on the other two."
The Honor Magic8 Pro, Oppo Find X9 Pro and vivo X300 Pro form an international selection of flagship camera phones. Each phone uses a three-module rear camera layout without dual telephotos. The main cameras have sensors around a 1/1.3" optical format with 23–24mm focal lengths and f/1.5–f/1.6 apertures; the Honor lacks a variable aperture and none use 1.0"-type sensors. Oppo and vivo ultrawides share identical sensors and 15mm-equivalent lenses, while Honor uses a slightly smaller sensor with a wider 12mm lens. All three ultrawides support autofocus. Telephoto modules use 200MP sensors; Honor and vivo employ larger 1/1.4" imagers while Oppo uses a 1/1.56" unit, and Oppo's periscope is 70mm f/2.1 versus 85mm f/2.6–f/2.7 on the others. Front cameras are similar.
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]