"And at $150, they might be even more elevated than usual. It's not that $150 is too much money in the world of wireless earbuds, it's that there are a ton of competitors in that range, and a lot of them punch above their weight classthe OnePlus Buds 4, Nothing's Ear, and Google's Pixel Buds 2a, for example. So, the next logical question is how do the Galaxy Buds 3 FE hold up against competition, and if we already know there are compromises built in, what exactly are they?"
"I won't mince words; I really like how the Galaxy Buds 3 FE sound. For wireless earbuds in this price range, they sound (at the risk of hyperbole) shockingly good. They don't have as much bass as some competitors like OnePlus and its recent pair, the OnePlus Buds 4, but I personally don't mind that at allI don't key in on bass when it"
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE cost $150 and position themselves as a Fan Edition, budget-friendly alternative to flagship earbuds. The earbuds deliver notably strong sound for the price, described as shockingly good, though bass is less pronounced than on rivals such as OnePlus Buds 4. Active noise cancellation performs only at a middling level. The design borrows the same blade look as the Buds 3 Pro but the finish feels less premium to the touch. Feature set is pared down relative to competitors like OnePlus, Nothing, and Google's Pixel Buds 2a, trading some functionality for a lower price.
Read at gizmodo.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]