"We must ensure that a working household earns more than a household that relies solely on welfare. This is a policy idea, and political thinking, right out of the right-wing party Les Républicains' play-book. Leader Laurent Wauquiez has long advocated a 'single social allowance' capped at 70 percent of minimum wage to combat 'welfare dependency'."
"In December, a report by the Office Français des Conjonctures Économiques (OFCE) stated unequivocally that, 'employment is always more lucrative than inactivity' - even for jobs earning the minimum wage, currently set at €1,823.03 before taxes for full-time hours (€1,443.11 after taxes and social charges)."
"The authors of the study ran the numbers on 20 'typical' familial scenarios, such as whether claimants were single or in a couple, were childless or had one, two, or more children in the household. In each case, the analysis demonstrated employment's financial superiority over welfare reliance."
France's social benefits system is generous, but political figures, particularly from the right-wing Les Républicains party, claim that welfare benefits are more lucrative than working. Employment Minister Jean-Pierre Farandou proposed a 'single social allowance' capped at 70 percent of minimum wage to ensure working households earn more than those on welfare. However, two studies, including a December report by the Office Français des Conjonctures Économiques (OFCE), demonstrate that employment is consistently more financially rewarding than inactivity. The OFCE analysis examined 20 typical family scenarios, including single individuals, couples, and households with varying numbers of children, finding that working always provides greater income than relying solely on benefits.
Read at The Local France
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]