"When you break things down, wheated bourbons aren't too different from their more popular rye-infused counterparts. The only real difference is that wheat is used as the secondary grain instead of rye, giving them a smoother, sweeter flavor that's incredibly mild yet complex. Because of this, some of the options out there can get pretty pricey, but there is one stand-out bottle you can grab for under $50, and it comes straight from the barrel: Maker's Mark Cask Strength."
"The bourbon has the same mash bill as the signature Maker's Mark bourbon -- corn, red winter wheat, and barley - but with a proof between 108-114, it's much more robust. Our tester found it to be bold yet easy on the palate, with an enticing oak-scented aroma. The spiced caramel and vanilla notes are incredibly pronounced and balanced with hints of rich toffee and nuts. A few drops of water helps bring out the bourbon's earthy quality."
"It seems we aren't the only fans of Maker's Mark Cask Strength. It has very favorable reviews online, with Reddit users calling it one of the "best value" bourbons around. One Reddit user wrote, "If you are somewhat new to bourbon tasting, this is one I really would recommend," while another also praised its approachability and its finish. People especially enjoy the nose of the spirit, which tasters say is reminiscent of marshmallow or caramel, and how drinkable it is."
Wheated bourbons use wheat as the secondary grain instead of rye, producing a smoother, sweeter, mild yet complex profile. Maker's Mark Cask Strength shares the Maker's Mark mash bill—corn, red winter wheat, and barley—and is bottled at 108–114 proof, delivering robust yet approachable character. Pronounced spiced caramel and vanilla complement hints of rich toffee, nuts, and an oak-scented aroma; a few drops of water reveal earthy qualities. The bottle is priced under $50 and receives strong online praise for value, integration of alcohol, drinkability, and a balanced finish suitable for new tasters and enthusiasts alike.
Read at Tasting Table
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]