Omission impossible: why the Oscars can never get their In Memoriam tribute right
Briefly

Omission impossible: why the Oscars can never get their In Memoriam tribute right
"As Bruce Davis, former executive director of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences told the LA Times in 2010, the process gets close to agonising by the end. You are dropping people who the public know. It's just not comfortable."
"The in memoriam process is a painstaking one, adjudicated on by a committee tasked with whittling a longlist of hundreds down to a final list of around 30. Critics of these omissions will usually imply they are down to forgetfulness or neglect on the part of the Academy."
The Oscars in memoriam segment, established in 1994, has become a tradition accompanied by recurring controversy over omitted figures. This year's ceremony notably excluded Brigitte Bardot, James Van Der Beek, Malcolm-Jamal Warner, and Dharmendra, sparking social media outrage. Critics often attribute these omissions to Academy forgetfulness, but the selection process is rigorous and deliberate. A committee systematically reduces a longlist of hundreds to approximately 30 names, a process described as agonizing by former Academy leadership. The 2024 ceremony featured prominent tributes to Rob Reiner, Claudia Cardinale, Catherine O'Hara, Diane Keaton, and Robert Redford, making the absences more conspicuous. Bardot's omission was particularly complicated by her controversial reception at France's César Awards, where her name was booed due to her association with far-right politics.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]