"George Orwell got a lot right about the totalitarian future we'd be facing today, but it was Terry Gilliam who predicted just how hopelessly humorous it would all be. The writer and director is best known for the heightened whimsy of movies like Monty Python and the Holy Grail, but each of his films, however cartoonish, harbors a jaded core."
"Brazil might be his darkest: a zany riff on Orwell's 1984, it could have stuck to loosely-connected sketches about the pitfalls of a near future. In early drafts, that's exactly what it was, and it probably would've been easier to market. Instead, Brazil is just as serious as it is silly. It hopscotches from one genre into the next with abandon, flirting with tragedy and absurdity as it tells its cautionary tale."
"It may feel like we're closer than we've ever been to Brazil's hyper-consumerist, morally defunct authoritarian regime, but Gilliam did work to make the film feel timeless. It's in neither the future nor the past; it could be set in a near-present Chicago or a crumbling European metropolis. It's brushing up against the towering cityscapes of something like Blade Runner, but office clerks still use pneumatic tubes to transfer paperwork."
Brazil blends cartoonish whimsy with a jaded, serious core to create a satirical, surreal dystopia that balances tragedy and absurdity. The film refuses a single genre, hopscotching between comedic sketches and a cohesive cautionary narrative that sharpens its warning. The unnamed city feels technologically modern yet inefficient, where pneumatic tubes and towering cityscapes coexist with bureaucratic disasters. Small mechanical failures cascade into wrongful arrests and state-blamed explosions, illustrating systemic moral decay. Early drafts were looser sketches, but a unified narrative intensified the portrait of hyper-consumerist authoritarianism and bureaucratic absurdity.
Read at Inverse
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]