Wolverine Floorhand Boots, Tough Winter Boot Review
Briefly

Wolverine Floorhand Boots, Tough Winter Boot Review
"For all that's been said about menswear swallowing up workwear as an aesthetic these last few years, inducting chore jackets and cargo pants into the canon of must-have pieces, boots are a completely different story. Boots have always been cool, even if you don't actually clock in for shifts at the lumberyard. '80s rockers and '90s rappers knew the virtues of a solid boot. They ran in them, so the rest of us can walk with swagger."
"While there exist several big name boot brands with cultural cache, Wolverine, established in 1883, is refreshingly uncool. Largely ignored by fashion types, Wolverine's boots have been free to just be damn fine work boots that offer comfort and durability at sweetheart prices. The workhorse of the brand, the Floorhand, is an unsuspecting boot that holds it down against more iconic stompers like the 6-inch Timberland or the 1460 by Doc Martens."
"Last year, when I needed a new pair of boots for various reasonsamong them being, "It's winter now"I came across Wolverine and was struck by the price tag: Just $78 on Amazon (at the time). Where rival boot brands command higher prices for not that much more beyond the name itself, I figured $78 is reasonable enough to gamble on a lesser-known brand that hasn't caught the attention of my menswear-obsessed friends."
Wolverine, established in 1883, focuses on practical, durable work boots rather than fashion cachet. The brand's Floorhand model delivers comfort, cushioning, and protection for everyday wear at a notably low price point (around $71–$78 on Amazon). The Floorhand competes with iconic styles such as the 6-inch Timberland and the 1460 Doc Martens while remaining less fashion-forward. Wolverine's relative anonymity has allowed its boots to prioritize function, offering durability and value without premium branding. The Floorhand suits anyone seeking a rugged, reliable boot that tolerates scuffs and daily use.
Read at www.esquire.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]