Historians battle over missed' male member in The Bayeux Tapestry
Briefly

The Independent focuses on the importance of quality journalism, especially in critical discussions around reproductive rights, climate change, and the influence of Big Tech. They aim to provide unrestricted access to their reporting, believing everyone deserves quality journalism supported by donations. Additionally, the article discusses the academic debate surrounding the Bayeux Tapestry, specifically the interpretation of depictions of male genitalia, highlighting differing opinions between historians George Garnett and Dr. Christopher Monk on the count of penises depicted in the fabric.
I am in no doubt that the appendage is a depiction of male genitalia the missed penis, shall we say? The detail is surprisingly anatomically fulsome.
If you look at what are incontrovertibly penises in the tapes... that yellow blob at the end is a scabbard of a man's dagger due to its construction.
Read at www.independent.co.uk
[
|
]