"Facing mounting legal troubles and regulatory hurdles, the Texas-based firm trying to restart offshore oil production along Santa Barbara's coast is now considering a plan that would keep its controversial project entirely in federal waters - a move that appears to avoid further California oversight. Sable Offshore Corp. announced Monday that it has started to pursue an option that would utilize an "offshore floating and treatment vessel" to treat and transport crude oil."
"The pivot would mark a major shift in Sable's push to bring the pipelines back online. The lines have sat idle since 2015, when a corroded section ruptured near Refugio State Beach, creating one of the state's worst oil spills. State officials and local environmentalists have repeatedly raised concerns about the pipes' capacity to run safely, as well as the process the company has taken to try to fast track their revitalization over the last year."
"Sable's announcement comes roughly a week after Santa Barbara County prosecutors filed criminal charges against the company, alleging it knowingly violated state environmental laws while completing pipeline repairs, and months after the California Coastal Commission found that the company failed to adhere to the state's Coastal Act despite repeated warnings, and fined them $18 million. Sable continues to contend it has followed all necessary protocols and met all legal requirements. Both issues remain tied up in court."
Sable Offshore Corp. is pursuing an offshore floating and treatment vessel to treat and transport crude oil, rather than restarting an onshore pipeline network. The plan would keep operations in federal waters, which could limit California regulatory oversight. The pipelines have been idle since a 2015 rupture near Refugio State Beach that caused a major oil spill. State officials and environmentalists have raised safety concerns about the pipes and about efforts to fast-track repairs. Santa Barbara County prosecutors filed criminal charges alleging state environmental law violations, and the Coastal Commission fined the company $18 million. Legal disputes continue in court.
Read at Los Angeles Times
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]