Four separate incidents of pollution in vital spawning and feeding grounds for freshwater fish have raised concerns over environmental accountability. Investigations revealed that companies like BAM and Gilvarry Farming Ltd faced fines and legal costs totaling less than â¬20,000, a stark contrast to the ecological harm caused. With the application of the Probation Act, penalties included minor donations and costs, provoking questions about the effectiveness of legal measures in protecting vulnerable habitats and declining fish stocks. As these cases finalize, they reveal systemic issues in enforcing environmental protections.
The court's decision highlights the leniency often afforded to violators affecting vital freshwater habitats, as fines and costs totaled less than â¬20,000 despite severe ecological impact.
The legal repercussions faced by the companies involved demonstrate a concerning trend where environmental damage is not adequately punished, endangering the recovery of struggling fish populations.
Collection
[
|
...
]