NEW ISSUE: The top 50 Premier League players ranked! Palermo's resurgence, Morgan Rogers and Nico Williams, Hearts' title tilt, World Cup play-offs previewed, plus Marcelo Q&A
Briefly

NEW ISSUE: The top 50 Premier League players ranked! Palermo's resurgence, Morgan Rogers and Nico Williams, Hearts' title tilt, World Cup play-offs previewed, plus Marcelo Q&A
"With January underway and 20 Premier League matchdays played, it was beginning to look as though the season was done and dusted. Nottingham Forest had just beaten West Ham to open up a seven-point gap between the two sides, while at the top, Arsenal were six points clear of Manchester City. You may like The fear was it could be a procession until May, with very little changing in the positions in the table that really mattered."
"In this issue of the magazine, we celebrate the footballers who make the English top flight the exciting and unpredictable league it is, as we rank the very best 50 players of the 2025-26 campaign. There will be those who say that it's always the same players in the list every year, but think again. Of last year's top 10, only three even make the top 50 this time around, such has been the emergence of new stars from Aston Villa, Brentford, Sunderland and Fulham."
FourFourTwo Issue 389 focuses on celebrating the Premier League's most exciting players through a comprehensive ranking of the top 50 performers in the 2025-26 season. Editor James Andrew notes that despite early predictions of a predictable season, the league has remained competitive, with teams like West Ham and Manchester City closing gaps on leaders Arsenal and Nottingham Forest. The issue highlights significant changes in player rankings, with only three players from the previous year's top 10 making the current list. New stars have emerged from Aston Villa, Brentford, Sunderland, and Fulham, demonstrating the league's unpredictability. The magazine also features additional content including the story of Palermo's rise from the fourth tier.
Read at www.fourfourtwo.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]