"Wikipedia is still free and run by volunteers. For some internet users, it's the launchpad for research. For others, it's the textbook itself: Many people don't bother to look into the cited sources, taking Wikipedia as the official record of history."
"Editing a non-fiction entry like a news event seems relatively simple- cover the facts -but it's hard to imagine a board of obsessives agreeing on a subjective field like music. The default is to copy journalist consensus, but when have music nerds ever reached consensus?"
"A batch of new Wikipedia writers have made a concerted effort to write entries for some of the most electric underground weirdness of the 2020s, to the chagrin of some longtime posters and the excitement of the artists getting their flowers."
"It's weird to think that just a handful of passionate, bored internet dwellers are sculpting the archive that people a decade from now will use to learn about this moment."
Wikipedia is a free, volunteer-run platform that serves as a vital resource for research and information. While many users accept it as an authoritative source, the editing process is open to anyone, leading to challenges in reaching consensus on subjective topics like music. Recent efforts by new writers have focused on documenting underground music scenes of the 2020s, addressing gaps in coverage and providing recognition to emerging artists. This grassroots editing effort shapes the historical record for future generations.
Read at Pitchfork
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]