"Hello everyone, I'm looking for the best way to store pictures, videos, and JS/CSS files that don't change for a web app. I'm not sure whether to use S3 with CloudFront or EFS. The most important things to me are keeping costs low and dealing traffic spikes well. It would also be helpful to keep track of usage metrics and see how my work is being used over time."
"Hello everyone, I'm looking for the best way to store pictures, videos, and JS/CSS files that don't change for a web app. I'm not sure whether to use S3 with CloudFront or EFS. The most important things to me are keeping costs low and dealing traffic spikes well. It would also be helpful to keep track of usage metrics and see how my work is being used over time. Has anyone used these sets for real work? Which one gave the best result for the least amount of money?"
Seeks the best storage approach for static web assets including pictures, videos, and JS/CSS files, comparing S3 with CloudFront versus EFS. Prioritizes minimizing costs and handling traffic spikes effectively. Wants the ability to track usage metrics and monitor how work is accessed over time. Requests real-world experience and cost-effectiveness comparisons between the two approaches. Focuses on immutable files that do not change and on solutions that scale economically during traffic surges. Looks for practical recommendations that balance performance, observability, and low operational cost.
Read at SitePoint Forums | Web Development & Design Community
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]