Platformisation without illusion: Separating integration from theatre | Computer Weekly

"The 'platformisation paradox' is that while it reduces the number of tools teams have to manage, it also creates a risk that many organisations overlook: too many critical decisions end up in a single place. When identity, access, security inspection, and network controls are all handled by a single platform, failures stop being small and isolated."

"The more power a platform has, the bigger the impact when it goes wrong. That's why CISOs need to treat these platforms as critical infrastructure, designed for resilience and failure, not just as products to trust by default. The real danger isn't platform consolidation itself; it's failing to govern and engineer these platforms as the single points of control they have become."

Enterprises pursuing platformisation expect unified security, networking, identity, and analytics to reduce complexity and improve resilience. However, many organizations experience integration theatre—platforms consolidating risk faster than reducing it through superficial integration. The platformisation paradox creates concentrated risk: when identity, access, security inspection, and network controls operate through a single platform, failures become systemic rather than isolated. Misconfigurations, software bugs, AI errors, or control-plane outages simultaneously affect logins, connectivity, and security. Historical cloud and identity outages demonstrate this danger. CISOs must build modular monoliths with deep component integration while maintaining architectural sovereignty. Platforms require governance and engineering as critical infrastructure designed for resilience and failure recovery, not default trust.

Read at ComputerWeekly.com