"Google Cloud's Expert Services Team has released a detailed guide on chaos engineering for cloud-based distributed systems. It highlights that the intentional creation of failures is essential for developing resilient architectures. The initiative provides open-source recipes and helpful guidance for applying controlled disruption testing in Google Cloud environments. The Google Cloud team addresses a critical misconception in the industry: that cloud providers' SLAs and built-in resiliency features automatically protect business applications."
"The framework outlined by Google Cloud is built on five fundamental principles. First, teams must establish a "steady state hypothesis" defining what normal system behavior looks like before introducing disruptions. Second, experiments should replicate real-world conditions that systems might encounter in production. Third, and most distinctively, chaos experiments should run in production environments with real traffic and dependencies-this differentiates chaos engineering from traditional testing approaches."
"The fourth principle emphasizes automation, treating resiliency testing as a continuous process rather than one-off events. Teams must conduct a thorough assessment of the "blast radius" of experiments. They should sort applications and services into tiers, depending on how much they could affect customers. Define steady state metrics, like latency and throughput. Formulate testable hypotheses, such as "deleting this container pod will not affect user login." Start in controlled non-production environments, then expand to production. Inject failures directly into systems and indirectly through environmental changes."
Chaos engineering for cloud-based distributed systems requires intentional failure injection to build resilient architectures. A common misconception is that cloud provider SLAs and built-in resiliency features automatically protect applications; applications unprepared for faults will fail when cloud services go down. A five-principle framework emphasizes defining a steady-state hypothesis, replicating real-world conditions, running experiments in production with real traffic, automating resiliency testing, and assessing blast radius with service tiering. Practical practices include defining steady-state metrics, formulating testable hypotheses, starting in non-production then expanding to production, and injecting failures directly and indirectly.
Read at InfoQ
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]