"The pandemic, notably, coerced the home to act as a site of extraordinary adaptability to absorb functions once delegated to schools, offices, gyms, and studios. This transformation has shifted how we imagine domestic life, urging us to think of the home not simply as a backdrop for activity but as a dynamic framework for living, producing, and creating. Within this expanded understanding, artists find themselves asking a renewed question: how can the home allow the flexibility needed for creative practice?"
"No longer just a room equipped with tools, the artist's studio becomes a negotiation between solitude and integration, between the rhythms of domestic life and the demands of creative production. This negotiation raises questions of scale, material, and orientation. Should the studio be folded into the corner of a living room, positioned on a rooftop, or detached as a retreat in the garden?"
The home functions simultaneously as shelter, sanctuary, workplace, and stage for daily rituals, with its role expanding significantly in recent years. The pandemic forced domestic spaces to absorb roles formerly occupied by schools, offices, gyms, and studios, prompting a reimagining of the home as an active framework for living, producing, and creating. Artists confront the need for flexibility within domestic settings. The studio's role shifts from a separate tool-filled room to a negotiated space balancing solitude and integration with domestic rhythms. Decisions about scale, materials, and orientation—corner nooks, rooftops, or detached garden retreats—determine how creativity integrates with everyday life beyond practicality.
Read at ArchDaily
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]