"Here is my read on the situation: This comes off as less of a declaration to move to Indiana and more like another push to Illinois lawmakers. This isn't to say I'm n ot taking Indiana's latest move seriously, but I am proceeding with caution. Don't get me wrong. It is clear that Indiana has a plan that the Bears seem interested in. But so much of this feels like public negotiation in place of actual action."
"On the surface, this feels like a significant step toward the Bears stadium being Indian. However, the Bears have made similar statements in the last about looking forward to building in Chicago and Arlington Heights. So I hope you'll understand where my skepticism comes from regarding this latest statement from the team. In any case, this situation is worth monitoring. But at some point, all this talk needs to turn into action."
The Bears stadium situation involves competing offers and public signaling from the team, Indiana, and Illinois lawmakers. Recent tweets indicated no Bears bill in Springfield while the team issued a statement that drew attention. Indiana has presented a concrete plan that interests the Bears, but the team's communications read as pressure on Illinois rather than a firm commitment. Prior similar statements from the Bears have promised interest in Chicago and Arlington Heights, contributing to skepticism. The state-level maneuvering resembles public negotiation, and continued monitoring is warranted until proposals translate into concrete, actionable steps.
Read at Bleacher Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]