"Ontario Superior Court Justice Anne Molloy stated, 'I will not be finding that the evidence of [the complainant] rises to the level of being even remotely reliable.' This statement underscores the judge's assessment of the complainant's testimony as fundamentally flawed."
"Stronach's lawyer, Leora Shemesh, pointed out that the complainant's testimony was riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions, which included changes in her narrative over the years regarding the timing of the alleged assault."
"Crown prosecutor Jelena Vlacic attempted to mitigate the impact of the date inconsistencies, arguing that the complainant had never been firm on the date of the alleged sexual assault, but Justice Molloy interjected to affirm the complainant's earlier certainty."
An Ontario judge ruled that the evidence presented by a complainant in Frank Stronach's sexual assault trial was unreliable and fatally flawed. Justice Anne Molloy stated she could not convict Stronach based on this testimony. The complainant alleged rape and indecent assault, but inconsistencies in her narrative raised concerns. Stronach's lawyer highlighted contradictions in the complainant's account, including discrepancies regarding the date of the alleged attack. The trial has seen a reduction in the number of charges against Stronach, now facing seven charges from four women.
Read at www.cbc.ca
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]