"Multicloud adoption has outpaced multicloud operational maturity. Enterprises are using multicloud, but they're not running multicloud. The gap isn't about choosing clouds; it's about operationalizing them as one business capability rather than maintaining separate technology estates that share only a logo on a PowerPoint slide."
"Each cloud has its own native console, identity patterns, network constructs, policy models, logging stacks, and security services. Each cloud also has its own culture and certification ecosystem, which encourages specialization rather than commonality, leading organizations to build different talent pools, buy different tool sets, and fund separate groups to own each cloud."
Large organizations have adopted multicloud environments not through deliberate strategy but through mergers, acquisitions, and product team decisions. The typical setup combines AWS, Microsoft, and Google with SaaS and on-premises systems. However, multicloud adoption has outpaced operational maturity. Organizations operationalize each cloud independently due to path-of-least-resistance practices, creating separate talent pools, tool sets, and governance structures. Each cloud platform maintains distinct consoles, identity systems, network constructs, policies, and security services. This siloed approach results in duplication, inconsistent controls, uneven security postures, and budgeting inefficiencies, despite the intention to avoid vendor lock-in and achieve resilience.
#multicloud-strategy #cloud-operations #organizational-silos #cloud-governance #enterprise-architecture
Read at InfoWorld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]