In Karen Read's murder retrial, defense expert Daniel Wolfe from ARCCA Inc. testified that damage to Read's SUV taillight was inconsistent with the prosecution's claims regarding the impact speed when her SUV allegedly struck Officer John O'Keefe. Wolfe conducted tests showing that the damage did not match scenarios proposed by the prosecution. The defense argues that Read was framed in a coverup, stating that O'Keefe was attacked inside a home instead. Wolfe's testimony challenges the reliability of the state's evidence and highlights procedural discrepancies in the investigation.
Wolfe's tests indicated that the damage to Read's taillight was inconsistent with the prosecution's claim of striking an arm at various speeds, raising doubts about the evidence.
The defense alleges that Read was framed in a coverup, claiming O'Keefe was attacked inside a home and not hit by her SUV.
Collection
[
|
...
]