Report: Celtics 'would love' to trade for former Defensive Player of the Year
Briefly

Report: Celtics 'would love' to trade for former Defensive Player of the Year
"According to NBA insider Matt Moore, the Celtics "would love" to trade for Memphis Grizzlies forward Jaren Jackson Jr., with Moore noting that "there is no team I've heard with more interest for Jackson." Jackson stands as the latest potential target linked to a Celtics team that could be on the prowl for more frontcourt help before the NBA trade deadline on Feb. 5."
"The cost would be high to acquire Jackson, given both his hefty contract and his standing as an impactful big man just entering the prime of his career at 26 years old. But, the No. 4 pick in the 2018 NBA Draft would be a major pickup for a reworked Celtics core still anchored by a pair of star talents in Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown."
"The two-time All Star is averaging 18.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 1.9 assists per game this season and won the Defensive Player of the Year award during the 2022-23 season. The 6-foot-10 Jackson would shore up Boston's defense in the paint, even though he isn't the strongest rebounder for his size. Granted, the return of Tatum later this season should boost Boston's current rebounding woes."
The Celtics have strong interest in trading for Grizzlies forward Jaren Jackson Jr., with multiple reports indicating Boston 'would love' to acquire him and significant interest compared with other teams. Jackson, 26, signed a five-year, $240 million max extension in July 2025 and averages 18.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 1.9 assists while earning 2022-23 Defensive Player of the Year. Memphis is considering roster changes amid potential rebuild chatter around Ja Morant, making Jackson's availability uncertain. Acquiring Jackson would require a high cost to cover his salary and value. Jackson would upgrade Boston's interior defense after offseason frontcourt departures, complementing stars Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown ahead of the Feb. 5 trade deadline.
Read at Boston.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]