""A writer," Saul Bellow once observed, "is a reader moved to emulation." But what if it's also the other way around? What if, when we think about writing, we are actually teaching ourselves how to read? For me, the act of setting words to paper always exists in conjunction with the question of what I have been reading-and why. Books, after all, require readers to bring them to life."
"I kept thinking about this reciprocal relationship as I read Into the Weeds, Lydia Davis's new book, adapted from a 2024 lecture and published as part of the Yale University Press series Why I Write. I tend to be allergic to these sorts of books, but I've long admired the restless intelligence of Davis's short fiction and essays, as well as the fact that, if Into the Weeds is any indication, she appears to feel the same."
Reading and writing operate as reciprocal practices that shape and inform one another. The act of writing often emerges in direct relation to what one has been reading and prompts questions about reading choices. Readers are necessary participants who bring books to life. The practice of reimagining reading and writing as a continuous back-and-forth prioritizes interpretive engagement over craft instruction. Such an approach functions more as a guide to reading than a how-to for making books. Shrinking media coverage and cuts to book criticism have reduced avenues for discovery. Algorithms and market pressures increasingly replace thoughtful criticism and curated recommendation.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]