This article discusses the complex perspectives on recent protests. Optimists cite large turnout sizes and the significance of non-violent mobilization, referencing a theory that suggests a mere 3.5% of a population can lead to regime change. Conversely, pessimists view the protests as largely performative. The article posits that while immediate policy changes are rare, protests are essential for building long-term movement power and morale. The piece underscores that grassroots opposition has thrived during Trump's second administration, with protest turnout reflecting broader social discontent and diverse participation.
Optimists emphasize large crowds at protests, recalling that 3.5% of a population engaging in non-violent mobilization can instigate regime change.
Though protests often don't prompt immediate policy changes, they are vital for morale and long-term movement power, countering defeatism.
Despite earlier narratives of Trump's power, protest numbers during his second term surpassed those during his first, suggesting grassroots opposition is robust.
The initial fear of protests being ineffective was misplaced; over 1,000 gatherings occurred, indicating a wide-reaching and diverse grassroots response.
Collection
[
|
...
]