The article reflects on the atmosphere at the Critérium du Dauphiné and the dynamics between racers, highlighting a specific incident involving Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard. Pogačar was asked if he liked Vingegaard more now that he's racing aggressively, a question that sparked discussion about the perception of Vingegaard’s methodical style. The author argues that this perspective is unfair and highlights that different racing approaches should be respected, emphasizing that success in cycling comes in various forms beyond mere aggressiveness.
"A rather unfair definition of Vingegaard's approach to racing... it feels like a shallow take to label the Dane's riding style as boring and dull to watch."
"Not every rider has the breadth of attributes that Pogačar is blessed with - it doesn't make them any less of a racer, though."
"Racing extends far beyond the riders duking it out at the pointy end of the race. It involves many nuances that contribute to the sport."
"Despite the criticism, Vingegaard's methodical approach and focus on the Tour de France have yielded significant success, underscoring the varied styles in cycling."
Collection
[
|
...
]