Elite riders feeling the squeeze in Kansas amid lightly vetted fields and chaotic aid stations - Unbound Gravel 'needs standards, not red tape'
Briefly

Unbound Gravel has evolved into a prominent event within the gravel racing calendar, drawing competitors from elite cycling levels. The author reflects on his experience, discussing how the atmosphere mirrors that of professional road racing, yet acknowledges discrepancies in organization and infrastructure. As gravel racing rapidly gains popularity, the need for race structures that support elite competition becomes apparent, especially as the 'spirit of gravel' conflicts with the demands of pro athletes. The vetting process for participants is described as lacking structure on race day, raising concerns about fairness and organization.
Gravel racing's evolution sees it now competing with the prestige of traditional road racing, yet the infrastructure is still lagging behind the competitive level.
Organizers of Unbound Gravel aim to balance competition and the spirit of gravel, but challenges arise from elite athletes competing under a mass participation format.
The vetting process for elite racers is intended to ensure a competitive field, yet the execution on race day can feel disorganized and uneven.
The growth of gravel racing, exemplified by events like Unbound, highlights a need for evolving race structures that accommodate pro-level athletes.
Read at Cyclingnews
[
|
]