"Databases offer those building systems a huge number of choices to try to get better performance. They come in four main groups, Pavlo said. They include system knobs such as runtime parameters and memory caching policies, physical design such as the data structure or index types, query tuning options that control how a database is going to execute a query, and lastly life cycle management involving long-term decisions over when to upgrade software or hardware."
"While machine learning techniques have built agents to try to solve these problems individually, addressing them as a whole leads to a phenomenal number of choices and combination of choices, many of which are interdependent. Earlier studies have tried to figure out an optimal sequence for these tunings, but they found the solution can depend on workload, and the choices made along the path to a solution mean the best one can be missed."
Automated database systems using vector embedding algorithms can improve default PostgreSQL service performance by two- to tenfold. Database tuning involves four main groups of choices: system knobs (runtime parameters and memory caching policies), physical design (data structures and index types), query tuning (execution control), and lifecycle management (timing of software or hardware upgrades). Machine learning agents have attempted to address these areas individually. Addressing all areas together creates a combinatorial explosion of interdependent choices whose optimal solution depends on workload. Exhaustive search runs out of compute time because each configuration must be evaluated by executing queries, risking missed optimal solutions along the tuning path.
Read at Theregister
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]