AI agents are being embedded across core business functions at scale, with over half of companies deploying them and ambitious targets for growth. Many agents operate without verification testing while carrying responsibilities in sensitive sectors like banking and healthcare. Effective agents need clear programming, high-quality training, and real-time insights to achieve goals reliably. Training and data disparities will create uneven agent capabilities, enabling more advanced agents to manipulate or outmaneuver less capable ones. Adaptive agents face heightened risk of unexpected or catastrophic failures. Monitoring, verification, and governance are necessary to manage divergence, power shifts, and systemic risks.
AI agents are now being embedded across core business functions globally. Soon, these agents could be scheduling our lives, making key decisions, and negotiating deals on our behalf. The prospect is exciting and ambitious, but it also begs the question: who's actually supervising them? Over half (51%) of companies have deployed AI agents , and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff has targeted a billion agents by the end of the year. Despite their growing influence, verification testing is notably absent.
AI agents require clear programming, high-quality training, and real-time insights to efficiently and accurately carry out goal-oriented actions. However, not all agents will be created equal. Some agents may receive more advanced data and training, leading to an imbalance between bespoke, well-trained agents and mass-produced ones. This could pose a systemic risk where more advanced agents manipulate and deceive less advanced agents. Over time, this divide between agents could create a gap in outcomes.
Collection
[
|
...
]