"Deutsche Bank called it " the summer AI turned ugly." For weeks, with every new bit of evidence that corporations were failing at AI adoption, fears of an AI bubble have intensified, fueled by the realization of just how topheavy the S& P 500 has grown, along with warnings from top industry leaders. An August study from MIT found that 95% of AI pilot programs fail to deliver a return on investment, despite over $40 billion being poured into the space."
"But Zuckerberg insists that the risk of over-investment is preferable to the alternative: being late to what he sees as an era-defining technological transformation. "There are compelling arguments for why AI could be an outlier," Zuckerberg hedged in an appearance on the Access podcast. "And if the models keep on growing in capability year-over-year and demand keeps growing, then maybe there is no collapse.""
"Then Zuckerberg joined the Altman camp, saying that all capital expenditure bubbles like the buildout of AI infrastructure, seen largely in the form of data centers, tend to end in similar ways. "But I do think there's definitely a possibility, at least empirically, based on past large infrastructure buildouts and how they led to bubbles, that something like that would happen here," Zuckerberg said."
Massive capital flows into AI have met mounting evidence of weak corporate adoption and poor returns, raising concerns of an AI bubble. An MIT study found 95% of AI pilot programs fail to deliver ROI despite more than $40 billion invested. Senior industry figures warned about overvaluation and investor enthusiasm, and the Fed noted unusually large economic activity tied to AI buildouts. Meta's CEO acknowledged the possibility of a bubble as infrastructure expands, but argued that over-investing is preferable to falling behind an era-defining shift. Historical infrastructure booms and data-center expansion raise empirical reasons for bubble risk.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]