In defense of not paying for AI
Briefly

In defense of not paying for AI
"Judging AI based on free-tier ChatGPT is like evaluating the state of smartphones by using a flip phone. The people paying for the best tools, and actually using them daily for real work, know what's coming."
"While an AI subscription might make sense if you're running into specific frustrations with the free versions, you can still get plenty of mileage without paying, and learn a lot about the state of AI in the process. Don't be frightened into buying something that hasn't actually proven its value to you."
"Part of the problem is that most people are using the free version of AI tools. The free version is over a year behind what paying users have access to."
AI enthusiasts often pressure users to purchase premium subscriptions by claiming free versions are inadequate and outdated. However, free versions of ChatGPT and Claude provide substantial value and enable meaningful engagement with AI technology. The argument that free tiers are over a year behind paid versions is factually incorrect. Users should only consider paid subscriptions if they encounter specific limitations with free versions that directly impact their work. Purchasing AI subscriptions based on fear of missing out is unnecessary when free options deliver considerable functionality and insights into AI's current state.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]