"This post is Part 1 of a series. In my previous post, I discussed the conundrum we face regarding artificial intelligence (AI) today: On one hand, we're told to use it or get left behind; on the other, we're warned about the "cognitive diminishment" that can result from that very use. I suggested the solution wasn't an uncritical embrace, nor an outright rejection. Yes, we need to learn to use AI. But the dilemma of cognitive decay remains."
"While claims that AI can boost creativity are common, there is little instruction on specific ways to use it that minimize the risk. I promised to provide those specific ways, and when it comes to promises, I have built my career and reputation (as a trial lawyer, a professor, and a consultant) on being reliable. So, let's dive into those now without delay."
Preventing cognitive decay is possible but requires deliberately inserting a workflow 'speed bump' and maintaining effortful engagement with AI tools. Consciously designed and structured AI use that promotes active learning and a growth mindset can enhance rather than diminish cognition. Individuals outside structured courses must create their own safeguards and periodic habits. Structure demands effort, and uncritical AI use often removes that effort, reducing thinking. Specific safeguards include having LLMs analyze personal usage for blind spots and risks, and adopting the One Thought Rule to ensure active contribution to every research-oriented inquiry. With modest, consistent effort, thinking skills and creativity can remain sharp.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]