"Human Agency Tokens measure what humans bring to an economy designed to count machine work. The body becomes its own ledger: brain state plus AI metrics plus outcomes triangulate genuine engagement. FSL provides the floor; HATs provides the agency. Together they keep humans visible as AI scales. The real power struggle is human-versus-human. AI is the accelerant-the question is who wields it, and how."
"In my last post I asked what happens if API tokens become a universal monetary standard - a computational lingua franca that makes AI labor legible, tradeable, and accountable across systems that currently cannot speak to one another. The question that immediately follows is not whether humans can still work, but something more fundamental: How does human contribution remain economically visible in a system whose basic unit of account tracks computational inference?"
"The goal would be equilibrium - a stable state where human beings can thrive rather than merely persist, where the preference is for an improved standard of living rather than bare survival. Human Agency Tokens, or HATs, are the structural answer to this problem - not a supplement to a token economy but the missing piece without which only AI work gets counted."
Human Agency Tokens (HATs) are proposed to record and value human contribution in an economy where API tokens measure computational inference. A Universal Token Standard would make AI labor legible, tradeable, and accountable across systems. A Free Subscription to Life (FSL) would guarantee baseline computational access and dignity, creating a floor for human abundance. The body acts as a ledger by combining brain state, AI metrics, and outcomes to verify genuine engagement. HATs plus FSL keep human work visible as AI scales and aim for an equilibrium that prevents destabilizing human suffering. The core struggle remains human-versus-human over control of AI as an accelerant.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]