Google released a technical report on the Gemini 2.5 Pro AI model weeks after its launch, but experts noted it is sparse and lacks crucial details. While Google's transparency efforts are appreciated, the absence of information related to their Frontier Safety Framework raises concerns. Experts find it challenging to evaluate the model's safety and security, leading to skepticism about the company's commitment to timely reporting on potential risks. Unlike competitors, Google publishes detailed safety evaluations only once it's confident that a model is ready for public use.
This [report] is very sparse, contains minimal information, and came out weeks after the model was already made available to the public.
It's impossible to verify if Google is living up to its public commitments and thus impossible to assess the safety and security of their models.
While I'm glad Google released a report for Gemini 2.5 Pro, I'm not convinced of the company's commitment to delivering timely supplemental safety evaluations.
Google's Frontier Safety Framework aims to identify AI capabilities that could cause "severe harm," but this report neglects to mention it.
Collection
[
|
...
]