Boos, AI-washing, and 'low-value human capital': The psychological traps CEOs are falling into when they botch their AI messaging | Fortune
Briefly

Boos, AI-washing, and 'low-value human capital': The psychological traps CEOs are falling into when they botch their AI messaging | Fortune
A CEO announcement about AI-driven layoffs can trigger public outrage, union condemnation, and regulatory scrutiny when language feels dismissive or dehumanizing. One example involved a bank CEO who said the firm would replace “low-value human capital” with artificial intelligence, prompting backlash and questions about the scope of job cuts. Similar failures occur when leaders use overly clinical or apocalyptic messaging, appear to “AI-wash” layoffs, or ignore public anxiety about AI. The core problem is communicating with boardroom language about a human experience, addressing one audience while damaging relationships with others. Effective leadership requires agile, moment-specific communication that builds trust across stakeholders.
"Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters proved that last week when he said the London-based bank would replace "low-value human capital" with artificial intelligence. The dismissive language triggered outrage from the public, condemnation from unions, and questions from regulators about the extent of potential job cuts. Winters spent several days trying to clean up the mess he'd created, but his attempt at an apology came across to many as weak."
"Winters joins a long line of CEOs who just can't get the messaging around AI right. They're often too clinical or too apocalyptic; they come off as disingenuous and have been accused of "AI-washing" layoffs done for other reasons; or they're so tone deaf about the public's AI anxiety that they've been booed during commencement addresses."
"Across the various foot-in-mouth episodes, CEOs are falling into a similar trap: They're using boardroom language to discuss the very human experience of work and job losses, and failing to recognize the full distance their messages travel, explains Sandra Sucher, a professor of management practice at Harvard Business School who studies trust. "What happens with some of these CEO announcements is that they are addressing one audience but harming their relations with another," she says."
"The very political job of leading a company requires an agile communication style and the ability to quickly tailor language and messaging to meet the moment at hand. And here's where Winters made his first mistake, says Denise Rousseau, a professor of organizational behavior and public policy at Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business. "He's talking with a kind of a C-suite language," she tells Fortune. She heard Winters' language-particularly the term "low-valued employees"-as a misreading of the room."
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]