"Young and Cantwell's comments come shortly after lawmakers failed to pass a 10-year moratorium on state AI regulations in last year's budget reconciliation bill. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in December that seeks to identify state laws deemed overly burdensome and withholds certain federal funding from those states, though some regulatory areas are exempt, like child safety."
"Proponents of a moratorium argue that a patchwork of state laws will stifle innovation as companies try to comply with disparate regulations. But opponents argue that stripping state regulations without a federal regulatory standard in place leaves the AI industry open to misuse and endangerment of people's privacy and safety."
A federal AI standard should provide uniform regulation while accommodating narrow state laws such as deepfake protections. Federal standards should align with constitutional responsibilities to facilitate interstate commerce while allowing for narrow state concerns and consumer protections. Blanket federal rules that ignore niche state laws risk ineffectiveness. Legislative efforts to impose a moratorium on state AI rules failed, and an executive order directs review of state laws deemed overly burdensome and may withhold federal funds, with exemptions for areas like child safety. Proponents warn that patchwork regulation will stifle innovation; opponents warn that removing state rules without federal guardrails endangers privacy and safety.
Read at Nextgov.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]