AI offers nearly endless possibilities for creation and storytelling. Designers and creators must decide which things are worth making and which stories are worth telling. That choice remains with makers and storytellers across disciplines, including artists, designers, illustrators, filmmakers, creators, and writers. AI currently does not originate intent and requires human instruction and detailed input to produce desired outcomes. Humans can invent, discover, and create, and humans build and guide LLMs to assist creative pursuits. AI can recombine or appropriate many ideas but cannot think independently or serve as the catalyst for creativity. Tools like AI are analogous to paintbrushes and do not make a designer.
If AI can help us make anything, tell any story, in any way possible, which thing is worth making, and which story is worth telling? Luckily, that choice is still left up to the maker/storyteller (Artist, Designer, Illustrator, Filmmaker, Creator, Writer, etc.). AI, at the moment, is not making; it is waiting for us to tell it what to make.
Humans can invent, discover, and create. We make computer LLMs (AI) that can assist us in this pursuit, but an AI is not the catalyst; we are. ChatGPT can make images but can not think so need more details AI can combine (ie, steal) many ideas, but still requires input from the user to achieve a desired outcome.
Collection
[
|
...
]