A Korean court has ruled in a class-action lawsuit that Samsung's practices regarding the throttling of Galaxy S22 phones constituted deceptive advertising, but the company was not held liable for damages. The court found that while Samsung's Game Optimizing Service misled consumers about gaming performance, this throttling affected only a subset of high-spec games and did not significantly influence the overall purchasing decisions of consumers. The lawsuit involved over 1,800 smartphone owners who sought damages but could not provide sufficient evidence for their claims.
A Korean court ruled Samsung engaged in deceptive labeling regarding the throttling of Galaxy S22 phones but found no evidence for damages, favoring Samsung in a class-action lawsuit.
The court acknowledged that while Samsung's throttling of Galaxy S22 phones misled consumers, it did not significantly impact purchase decisions, hence Samsung wasn't liable for damages.
Collection
[
|
...
]