"For many reasons, because in my view we just started this journey. Our infrastructure isn't ready, I feel Juventus, Inter and Milan have the structure, strength in depth and wage bills that are above all the other clubs. Every time someone other than that group wins a trophy, it means something truly extraordinary has happened. We mustn't bury our heads in the sand and act like we are on the same level as these clubs. We try to bridge the gap as much as possible with hard work and dedication, but we cannot ignore that gap exists."
"➤ Players owned by the club, taking into account the amortization quota and gross salary (and considering the tax breaks provided by the Growth Decree for the players who still benefit from them) players who arrive on a temporary basis, for which the cost of the loan and the gross salary are taken into account. ➤ Club-owned players who are temporarily sold, for which only the amortisation portion is considered (and the salary only if paid by the club, since it is normally covered by the purchasing company)"
The club's infrastructure and squad depth remain behind Juventus, Inter, and Milan, with lower wage bills and squad value. Occasions when a club outside that trio wins a trophy are presented as extraordinary. Efforts focus on bridging the competitive gap through hard work and dedication, while acknowledging the limits imposed by financial and structural differences. An updated financial analysis based on statements to June 2025 compares squad costs to quantify investment levels. Squad cost calculations include amortisation quotas, gross salaries, loan costs for temporary arrivals, and amortisation portions (and salaries when still paid by the original club) for temporarily sold players.
Read at SempreMilan
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]