SciencefromPatently-O3 days agoTime Machines, Cold Fusion, and a Glucose Problem: A 2026 Report on 101 UtilityUtility rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101 are rare at the USPTO and often reflect implausible or strange underlying disclosures.
Intellectual property lawfromPatently-O4 days agoSixteen Years of 101: What Actually Moves ExaminersPatent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 uses a two-step framework, and examination data can be analyzed to identify § 101 rejections.
fromPatently-O2 months agoIntellectual property lawThe Recentive Ratchet: RPI's NLP Patent Falls to the New-Environment Rule
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law3 months agoIntellectual property lawCAFC Affirms Rule 12(b)(6) 101 Dismissal for Google in Precedential Ruling on Software Claims
Intellectual property lawfromPatently-O4 days agoSixteen Years of 101: What Actually Moves ExaminersPatent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 uses a two-step framework, and examination data can be analyzed to identify § 101 rejections.
fromPatently-O2 months agoIntellectual property lawThe Recentive Ratchet: RPI's NLP Patent Falls to the New-Environment Rule
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law3 months agoIntellectual property lawCAFC Affirms Rule 12(b)(6) 101 Dismissal for Google in Precedential Ruling on Software Claims
Intellectual property lawfromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law2 weeks agoCAFC Affirms Ineligibility Holding for AR Patent ClaimsThe CAFC upheld the invalidation of AR patent claims as abstract ideas under 35 U.S.C. § 101, lacking an inventive concept.