#patent-eligibility

[ follow ]
#pera-2025
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
1 week ago

Other Barks and Bites for Friday, October 10: SCOTUS Invites SG's Views on RiseandShine's Trademark Issues; MPA Urges OpenAI to Address Sora 2 Infringement; and UPC to Add Third Panel to Court of Appeal

Want to have your doggie(s) featured in one of our future Barks & Bites Columns? Send your dogs photo(s) along with their name, breed (if you know it) and their age to [email protected] . All photos will be added to the IPWatchdog Dog Wall at IPWatchdog Studios and will be added to the queue of images we select from each week.
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
1 week ago

PERA 2025: Eligibility Reform Returns to Capitol Hill

Chairman Thom Tillis (R-NC) and ranking member Adam Schiff (D-CA) both acknowledged the widespread confusion in current eligibility jurisprudence, with Tillis noting that the status quo "continues to be hopelessly confused" and expressing determination to move the bill forward to committee markup. The Bill has bipartisan support in the Senate, but it is unclear how hard those in opposition would push if the bill started to move forward.
Intellectual property law
#software-patents
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
1 week ago

Guest Post by Ryan Abbott: Reflections on Recentive v. Fox: To Do or not To Do it with AI?

Patents that merely apply existing machine-learning methods to new data environments are not patent eligible; current law still permits patenting of substantive AI innovations.
frompatentlyo.com
3 weeks ago

Thanks for Your Input: Federal Circuit Ignores USPTO's 101 Framework (Again)

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB determination that claims directed to vehicle identification systems for ridesharing services were unpatentable for obviousness, but reversed the Board's grant of Rideshare's motion to amend substitute claims. Judge Hughes, writing for the panel, held that the substitute claims were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101 because they merely used technology as a tool to improve user experience rather than improving computer functionality itself.
#section-101
#uspto
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
3 weeks ago

Judge O'Malley Reflects on CAFC Tenure, Patent Law Challenges, and Advice for New IP Attorneys at IPWatchdog Women's IP Forum

Judge O'Malley, who served on the Federal Circuit from 2010 to 2022 after 16 years in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, was the first former district court judge to be appointed to the Federal Circuit. Her unique perspective as both a trial and appellate judge has continued to shape her views on the judiciary, patent law challenges, and the future of IP.
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
1 month ago

The PowerBlock Problem: A Roadmap for Dodging Patent Eligibility Hurdles

The petition argues that the panel's holding directly conflicts with the court's precedent in Yu v. Apple Inc., 1 F.4th 1040 (Fed. Cir. 2021) as well as Supreme Court precedent by allowing systems to avoid ineligibility simply by reciting conventional components that perform basic functions at a high degree of generality. The patent in this case seems to me similar to so many others -- it claims a known physical system at a fairly high level of generality and couples that with previously unknown information processing.
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
3 months ago

En Banc Ineligibility Petition in Longitude Licensing v. Google

Longitude Licensing Ltd. v. Google LLC highlights the ongoing patent eligibility challenges as the Federal Circuit dismisses claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for generic, functional limitations.
Intellectual property law
[ Load more ]