NO JUDGMENT
Briefly

Buchloh's answers embody a tension between free-market capitalism and participatory leftist politics, reflecting strident concerns about the ideological implications of art criticism today.
As the interviews progress into "Part 3: Dissensus", there's a notable shift where Foster's inquiries become sharper, highlighting the subtext of respect and intellectual challenge between the two.
This book culminates in a significant back-and-forth, a dialogue that encapsulates disagreements not just in theory but in the practical roles of critic and historian.
Foster's questions resonate with personal reflection, probing Buchloh's views on familial and societal influences, while Buchloh's responses challenge prevailing art historical narratives.
Read at Artforum
[
|
]