The purpose is obvious. I get that teaching English spelling is a nightmare and putting a word into a sentence shows that you know what it means, and hopefully helps you remember how to spell it.
But, oh Lord, the agonising, circuitous routes around words you'd have to find to construct a bloody sentence.
I've never in my life used the first two. And anyway, aren't you better off using relevance, dominance or abundance? Don't they mean the same?
Michael Gove celebrated the dominancy of his theories on teaching, dismissing complaints at the limited relevancy of the stupid words.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]