"No. It's insanity. And the fact is that they are good NATO partners of ours, so you can't even claim that it's damaging to America's national security interests because, well, they're our NATO ally. And the White House yesterday saying that invading Greenland has always been an option. No, it's not an option unless you are absolutely insane. He continued, warning the move would upend an order that delivered a century of U.S. dominance and slamming idiots who would say otherwise:"
"Everything we've set up, the world order that we set up starting in 1947 led to the American century, led to American dominance, led to America's military by and far being the strongest military in the history of mankind, led us to be the most powerful country when it comes to soft power, led us to become the most powerful economic machine in history, in world history."
Rhetoric about invading or purchasing Greenland provoked concern from European nations and Denmark, which owns the territory. Such proposals would contradict NATO partnership and would not advance U.S. national security interests. Pursuing military intervention or acquisition of Greenland would undermine the post‑1945 and post‑1947 international order that produced American military, economic, and soft‑power dominance. Wealthy individuals promoting the idea were criticized as acting against the global system that enabled their prosperity. Maintaining established alliances, international norms, and the existing order is presented as essential to continued U.S. leadership and stability.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]