During one especially illuminating moment, Chief Justice John Roberts attempted to draw Julie Rikelman... She made a broader argument that narrowing women's access to the procedure could disproportionately harm low-income women or those experiencing personal crises.
Why would a Supreme Court Justice, in considering such a crucial issue, not be interested in knowing 'the data'? Roberts's colleagues signalled a similar disregard in the draft opinion for the Dobbs case that was published by Politico.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]