Trump Lawyer Gets Laughed At After Invoking Climate Hoax' In Bonkers Supreme Court Moment
Briefly

Trump Lawyer Gets Laughed At After Invoking Climate Hoax' In Bonkers Supreme Court Moment
"JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: What's the reason to accept the notion that Congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president? SOLICITOR GENERAL D. JOHN SAUER: We don't contend that again. JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: You do, you say it's unreviewable, there's no manageable standard, nothing to be done. Tell me if I'm wrong, you backed off that position. SOLICITOR GENERAL D. JOHN SAUER: Maybe that's fair to say. JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: Okay, alright. Thank you. (LAUGHTER) SOLICITOR GENERAL D. JOHN SAUER: That would be, I think, an abdication. That would really be an abdication, not a delegation. JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: I'm delighted to hear that you know. (LAUGHTER)."
"I want to return to something Justice Sotomayor asked under this statute okay. So now we're in this statute. It's a major question though. Could the president impose a 50 percent tariff on gas-powered cars and auto parts to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat from abroad of climate change? SOLICITOR GENERAL D. JOHN SAUER: It's very likely that that could be done. JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: I think that has to be the logic of your view. SOLICITOR GENERAL D. JOHN SAUER: Yeah, in other words, obviously this administration would say that's a hoax, it's not a real crisis, but JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH: I'm sure you would! (LAUGHTER)."
The Supreme Court considered a challenge to presidential authority to impose sweeping tariffs under emergency powers. The government's position suggested emergency powers might permit tariffs targeting foreign threats, potentially including climate change. A hypothetical was raised about imposing a 50 percent tariff on gas-powered cars and parts to address climate change as an unusual and extraordinary threat from abroad. Laughter followed when a characterisation of climate change as a 'hoax' was invoked. The exchange included an acknowledgement that transferring war-declaration power to the president would amount to an abdication rather than a delegation.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]