Alisa Perales' lawsuit against California and the US government over voting rights sparked discussions on age discrimination in democracy. Despite her case being dismissed, the concept of lowering the voting age gains traction with supporters like John Wall and Clementine Beauvais advocating for ageless voting. They argue that including young voters could enhance decision-making. Wall notes that the average excluding young people means denying a large population's opinions on critical issues. Both scholars highlight the importance of youth perspectives and how they can balance the experience of older voters, asking essential questions about society's future.
Perales' lawsuit brought to light the issue of under-age voter exclusion as a form of age discrimination, sparking renewed debates on voting rights for younger citizens.
Political philosopher John Wall advocates for ageless voting, pointing out that a significant portion of the population is excluded from decisions that impact their lives.
Clementine Beauvais argues that including younger voters leads to better decisions, as they offer unique perspectives and long-term thinking that complement older voters' experience.
Both Wall and Beauvais reveal that initial reactions to ageless voting often shift from laughter to thoughtful consideration, indicating an open mindset to the idea.
Collection
[
|
...
]