Proposed legislation aims to freeze state regulations on generative AI, restricting states from enforcing laws against deep fakes, algorithmic discrimination, and misuse of personal likenesses. Supporters claim it prevents a fragmented regulatory landscape. However, criticism focuses on how it enables generative AI companies to misuse personal data without accountability. Recent negotiations led to a reduction of the proposed ban's duration from ten years to five. Nonetheless, the existing laws in multiple states addressing deceptive practices may be rendered ineffective under the new provisions.
The proposed freeze on state and local governments' ability to regulate generative AI would prevent enforcement of laws aimed at curbing harms such as deep fakes and algorithmic discrimination.
Supporters argue that preventing a fragmented regulatory landscape could foster innovation and US competitiveness, yet it appears to grant generative AI companies unchecked freedom over personal data.
Despite some Republican opposition to unrestricted access for generative AI companies, recent negotiations have reduced the duration of the ban from ten years to five years.
Exemptions have been introduced for state laws focused on unfair practices, child safety, and publicity rights, but existing laws in several states may become ineffective.
Collection
[
|
...
]