"President Donald Trump boasts that his tariffs protect American industries, lure factories to the United States, raise money for the federal government and give him diplomatic leverage. Now, he's claiming they can finance a windfall for American families, too: He's promising a generous tariff dividend. The president proposed the idea on his Truth Social media platform Sunday, five days after his Republican Party lost elections in Virginia, New Jersey and elsewhere largely because of voter discontent with his economic stewardship - specifically, the high cost of living."
"The tariffs are bringing in so much money, the president posted, that "a dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone." Budget experts scoffed at the idea, which conjured memories of the Trump administration's short-lived plan for DOGE dividend checks financed by billionaire Elon Musk's federal budget cuts. "The numbers just don't check out," said Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation."
"The tariffs are certainly raising money - $195 billion in the budget year that ended Sept. 30, up 153% from $77 billion in fiscal 2024. But they still account for less than 4% of federal revenue and have done little to dent the federal budget deficit - a staggering $1.8 trillion in fiscal 2025. Budget wonks say Trump's dividend math doesn't work."
President Donald Trump proposed a $2,000-per-person tariff dividend funded by increased tariff revenue, excluding high-income people. The proposal followed Republican losses attributed largely to voter discontent over economic stewardship and high living costs. Details on income limits and whether children would qualify remain unspecified. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had not discussed the dividend and suggested any rebate might instead take the form of tax cuts. Tariff collections rose to $195 billion in the budget year ending Sept. 30, up 153% from $77 billion, yet they account for under 4% of federal revenue and have not meaningfully reduced the $1.8 trillion deficit.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]